In striking down the Defense of Marriage Act, the Supreme Court has allowed an environment in which civil rights, such as the right of same sex couples to marry, can come in conflict with constitutionally guaranteed rights, such as religious expression.
Is it the Court's intent that in all cases civil rights hold a position of supremacy and preference over constitutional rights? If not, by what method(s) are such conflicts resolved? Is the current condition not a violation of procedural due process and the prohibition against vague laws?
Please prevent any further unnecessary drama and suffering on the part of the people by directing the Court to take up this important issue.
Respectfully submitted, 9/4/2015.