Demand A.I.G. pay a additional sum for bailout funds unless the company refuses to take part in a proposed lawsuit.

A.I.G. is potentially joining a lawsuit against the United States for seizing of property without just compensation, I.e. they claim the interest demanded by the terms of the government bailout in 2008 was excessive and denied them of their constitutional right to their property--or more simply put, their money. Though the interest was higher than that demanded from the banks that took bailout money, the banks are and will continue to be subject to FED regulation--A.I.G. is and will not be in the future. In addition to extravagant executive bonuses, most firms insured by A.I.G. who bundled poor investments and then insured them against loss received full compensation. A.I.G. should be made to payback an additional sum, congruent to that which the FED carried in additional risk for A.I.G