Clinton pollster Joel Benenson told reporters, “I don’t think voters are interested in the transcripts of her speeches.” I want to prove them wrong.
If Hillary truly has nothing to hide in her speeches to Goldman-Sachs, there is no reason for her to keep them private. In an effort for transparency this election cycle, we have a right to know what was said behind those closed doors.
If you get paid $650,000 for three speeches, they must have been very, very good. If she is to be the nominee, we deserve to know what her positions are on the Wall Street firms, and releasing the transcripts will illuminate her true feelings.