This is historical material “frozen in time”. The website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work.
We the people ask the federal government to Change an existing Administration policy:

Overturn Discrimination in the workplace

Created by S.P. on October 09, 2016

This ruling (refusal to hire based on Dreadlocks) interferes with our cultural right. The U.S. Court of Appeals ruled in favor of CMS (Catastrophe Management Solutions), affirming that it’s legal for companies to refuse/terminate employment based on hairstyle. Their logic is as follows: No hairstyle is inherently linked to any particular race.
This seeds major cultural and religious impact to African Diaspora (communities throughout the world that have resulted by descent from the movement in historic times of peoples from Africa, predominantly to the Americas) , The first amendment and Title VII outlaw racial discrimination. This ruling conflicts with The 9th amendment. This emboldens corporate discrimination based on not just the natural state of our hair, but any state.

Civil Rights & Equality
Economy & Jobs
Urban Policy
Return to top