A poor Refugee has been wrongfully convicted for a Crime which there was Factual Evidence of his Actual Innocence

The Refugee was charge with a crime by the US Prosecutor.The Refugee plead not guilty. On Trail, the alleged Victims directly testified he was innocent of the Crime for which the Government charged him with. The US Judge permitted the US Prosecutor to present evidence well beyond the scope of the Indictment and accidentally entered factual evidence of his Innocence - placing him in another State as oppose to committing crime in another State. His Attorney motion for an Judgement of Acquittal 2 times due to no evidence warrant jury consideration - The US Judge denied them. the Trial Jury render him guilty despite the Factual evidence of Innocence. His Attorney motioned again under F.R.CR.P. rule 29(c) - The US Judge denied the motion on a Presumptive hope and no fact could or was found