This is historical material “frozen in time”. The website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work.

Require judges to use arena judging, peer review, or rubric in custody cases before putting a custody order into place

Created by S.N. on April 09, 2014

Depending on a single judge’s decision and "feeling," a permanent life-altering outcome is determined for children. We teachers use arena judging/scoring to make sure we are being as fair as possible in the scores we give students although their are individual differences especially in writing. After grading student work as a team, we see more consistency in our scores. Consistency is what is necessary and to establish it in custody matters judges should be required to use arena judging, peer review, and/or a rubric(s) in the state courts before putting a court order into place. I have met individuals throughout the custody process who have shared their custody outcomes with me and have found huge discrepancies in the decisions made by judges throughout the United States.

Economy & Jobs
Government & Regulatory Reform
Return to top