This is historical material “frozen in time”. The website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work.

To review the supreme court decision, United States v. Miller 1939, in regards to the proposed ban on assault rifles.

Created by N.H. on February 26, 2013

There is a Supreme Court ruling that already directly relates to the current Assault Weapon Ban.

In United States v. Miller 1939, Miller possessed a sawed-off shotgun banned under the National Firearms Act. He argued that he had a right to bear the weapon under the Second Amendment. The Supreme Court ruled against him. At the time, sawed-off shotguns were not being used in a U.S. military application. The Miller case set the precedent that protected firearms have a military and thus a legitimate and protected Militia use.

The AR-15/AK-47 type weapon is currently in use by the American military. Therefore, it is a protected weapon for the Unorganized Militia, which includes just about every American citizen.

Gun Violence
Return to top