AN UNEDUCATED OR MISINFORMED VOTE IS MORE DAMAGING THAN NOT VOTING AT ALL. UNFORTUNATELY MANY AMERICANS DECIDE WHOM THEY WISH TO VOTE FOR BASED UPON BREIF INTERPRETATIONS OF SHORT CAMPAIGN COMMERCIALS. ELECTORAL CANDIDATES WITH ACCESS TO THE LARGEST AMOUNTS OF MONETARY FUNDS DO UNFAIRLY HAVE AN ADVANTAGE GETTING ELECTED INTO OFFICE BY WAY OF MONETARY INFLUENCE. ALL CANDIDATES RUNNING FOR LOCAL, STATE, AND FEDERAL OFFICE NEED FEDERAL REGULATIONS IN PLACE THAT STRUCTURE AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY FOR THE DISSEMINATION OF INFORMATION TO THE AMERICAN PUBLIC BY WAY OF LIMITING THE SPENDING WITHIN INDIVIDUAL CAMPAIGNS TO A PREDETERMINED ALLOTMENT BASED ON PERCENTAGE OF MONATARY FUNDS WITHIN FEDERAL, STATE, OR LOCAL TREASURIES AND DIVVIED EVENLY TO EACH CANDIDATE WHILE PROHIBITING ALL OTHER FUNDING.



