This is historical material “frozen in time”. The website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work.

Uphold McDonald V Chicago:owning firearm ok in the home for lawful purposes & regulation is constitutionally permissible

Created by M.J. on January 13, 2013

Please sign if you want states to be able to regulate gun ownership as they wish. Focus on last 3 sentences: Source OLR Research Report 2010-R-0314, SUMMARY OF MCDONALD V. CHICAGO GUN CASE, By V. Rose. (My paraphrase & emphasis mine). McDonald v Chicago Court (5-4 decision) held that an individual's right to keep and bear arms is incorporated and applicable to the states through the 14th Amendment's Due Process Clause. BUT the Court reiterated in McDonald that the 2nd Amendment only protects a right to possess a firearm in the home for lawful uses such as self-defense. It stressed that some firearm regulation is constitutionally permissible and the 2nd Amendment right to possess firearms is not unlimited. It does not guarantee a right to possess any firearm, anywhere, and for any purpose.

Gun Violence
Return to top