This recent bill intended to give consumer's a "choice" or in the words of Katie Hill, a White House spokeswoman, “This measure will provide new opportunities for consumers to have access to information about their food," will do neither and in facts only discourages further education and understanding on GMO's and will be used as evidence to suggest that a decision had been made and that if it has to be labeled it must somehow be "bad."
Decision and evidence to support anti-GMO arguments are light at best and this legislation needs to be put on hold until such time as there is an overwhelming consensus in the scientific community, just as we have with Climate Change and the effects of Tobacco.