Residents of public housing were granted the right to have pets in 1998. Residents in private housing can still be denied that right.
No-pet clauses have already been deemed unreasonable, abusive, and contrary to public order in France, Belgium, and Ontario.
Landlords cite damage as a main concern. The case Jerome Realty Co. v. Yankovich found that the law already adequately protects landlords from dirty and destructive tenants; therefore a ban on dogs was unreasonable.
A study by FIREPAW found that 82% of renters with pets struggle to find housing.
No-pet clauses deny renters health benefits associated with pets including reduced anxiety and blood pressure, and increased exercise and socialization.
The #1 reason for giving up a pet to a shelter is due to residential pet restrictions.