This is historical material “frozen in time”. The website is no longer updated and links to external websites and some internal pages may not work.
We the people ask the federal government to Take or explain a position on an issue or policy:

Whys FCC / FDA etal let ignore post Minamata Convention 2013 Amalgam clause & Notice of Inquiry ET Docket #13-84/03-137

Created by B.A. on June 01, 2016

Congress & President etal needs call for a review of agency heads FDA,EPA,FCC, et al . It was only required Dentist et al to be told Risk vs informing public pre & or post facts Health probabilistic impact Amalgam Dental Mercury alone an or non ionizing radiation synergetic interactions {psychotronics}. Now Post Fact Minamata Convention 2013 or New FCC notice of inquiry et docket #13-84/03-137 all parties are seemingly ignoring clauses that would other wise by law call force said notices & Changes to general public & or Agencies & Health practitioners with updated laws & rules in concern of stopping uses & inform public post fact to direct over cite via treatment options & prevention's of misdiagnoses to prevent the uses in general to prevent Harm caused related to draw downs

Education
Government & Regulatory Reform
Health Care
Return to top