(writ of) mandamus / Quo Warranto Circuit Judge David M. Ebel is wrong Bonidy v. United States Postal Service

Supreme Court’s landmark D.C. v. Heller and McDonald v. Chicago rulings, the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals held 2 Amendment doesn't protect rights outside of 1’s home. Citing, Bonidy v. United States Postal Service, challenged 39 C.F.R. § 232.1(l), which prohibits the storage / carriage of firearms on USPS property Citing Firearms Policy Coalition , Seams the Judge Backed constructive treason where the duty would be to with in reason to maintain the context of Efficiency of Militia of the unorganized Dick Act 1903 by type of arms in relations to duty ,where 1 has the right to be so does be the right to stand, .” (Wharton’s Criminal and Civil Procedure, 12th Ed., Vol.2: Judy v. Lashley, 5 W. Va. 628, 41 S.E. 197) , - Cockrum v. State, 24 Tex. 394, at 401-402 (1859) , -- remove Judge